iam

Project reviews and provenance

This directory records review work, supplied critiques and reproducible experiments. It is not a claim of independent security certification.

The project maintainer, mathorn1973, directed the work and authorized publication. OpenAI Codex and its AI agents prepared the project’s September 2026 reviews, the iam-core 1.1 revisions, reference code, vector generators and tests in the same collaborative workflow. Maintainer approval is not presented as a separate technical audit.

Material Provenance and limits
REVIEW.cs.md, review resolutions, scripts and generated results Project review produced with Codex agents under maintainer direction. It is not an independent third-party audit.
first-audit.md A critique supplied by the maintainer and retained under its original title and filename. The repository does not establish its author’s identity, human/AI authorship or independence. The word “audit” in the supplied title is not certification by this project.
proposal-review.md A later supplied critique whose text says it shares an author with the first. It is not counted as a second independent reviewer; its authorship and independence have not been independently verified here.
Python reference code and Node-generated vectors Separate implementations and code paths within the same project/agent workflow. Their agreement does not constitute an outside implementation or an independent audit.

The dated review record identifies the original specification snapshot, preserved inputs and reproduction commands. Historical findings must be read against that pinned version.

Future external contributions should state author, affiliation, tool/AI assistance, reviewed revision, scope and access to existing implementations. An implementation from the specification is requested through a PR. No such completed independent implementation is claimed by this directory.